|
BOOK REVIEW
HARDWIRED BEHAVIOR: WHAT NEUROSCIENCE REVEALS ABOUT MORALITY
By Laurence Tancredi
Cambridge University Press, 2005
Hardback $19.13
Laurence Tancredi is uniquely qualified to write about the neural roots of
human morality. As a lawyer, Tancredi has consulted in many legal
cases involving the effects of toxins on brain function and behavior, as
well as criminal cases involving assault, rape, and homicide. In addition,
he is a noted physician and Professor of Psychiatry at New York
University School of Medicine, as well as the author of several books on
law, ethics, and psychiatry.
In this new book, Tancredi poses such questions as: Are the brain and
the mind separate? How does the physical brain work to develop moral
decisions? What is the biology of mental illness? Are specific moral rules
innate? What is the impact of hormones on psychosexual development?
How important is free will? The answers to these questions, as Tancredi
shows, are rapidly emerging as our understanding of the brain evolves-
and those answers are challenging our most basic ideas about good,
evil, and free will.
Hardwired Behavior is written to be easily understood by lay
readers, but will also be of great interest to behavioral researchers and
legal professionals. Each chapter of the book has between 19 and 75
references, providing additional resources.
We strongly recommend this book for anyone involved in the study of
immoral behavior in such disparate areas as money, deception, sex, or
criminal activity.
Quotes from HARDWIRED BEHAVIOR
by Laurence Tancredi:
Our view of morality has already been altered by new understanding
of brain biology, and at the rate that new discoveries are being made,
that view will change even more in the future. With these changes will
come the understanding that we can intervene at the most fundamental
biological levels to affect moral development.
(R)ecent neuroimaging and genetic studies have revealed specific
brain images that correlate with discrete gene dysfunction to produce a
child who is very likely to become highly violent and antisocial as an
adult.
Since the late 1980s, positron emission tomography (PET) studies
have been conducted on violent and aggressive offenders. These have
shown correlations between brain metabolism and the potential for
violent behavior. PET studies of repetitively violent offenders revealed
decreased cortical blood flow and hypometabolism in their nondominant
frontal and temporal lobes, compared to control subjects. Some even
showed involvement into the prefrontal region, which affects cognitive
understanding.
(H)ow many of us would accept the idea that our personal choices in
life are influenced, even determined, by brain biology? We resist this
notion even if we've known older people, perhaps in our own families,
who have suffered stroke or a serious disease such as Alzheimer's, and
we've seen how such physical brain injuries can affect not only their
ability to move but their ability to think rationally.
(N)euroscience is forcing us to rethink the extent of our personal
control over our choices, and the implications of limits on personal
control over our choices are nothing short of mind-boggling.
Imaging studies of true psychopaths, who lack empathic abilities, are
demonstrating structural and functional abnormalities in some of these
key areas of the brain, particularly the prefrontal cortex and the limbic
system.
(E)ach of us holds our own position on the spectrum of being
influenced by neurochemicals and brain changes from the prenatal
phase of our development. We may not be able to control gender or
sexual preferences, as these appear to be shaped prenatally and during
the early years of development, but most of us can exert some control
over our behavior. Nonetheless, the degree of that control is largely
determined by biological forces.
Understanding how parts of the brain work to affect our thinking and
behavior may eventually transform our formerly sacrosanct beliefs about
personal identity and free will.
Our objective should be to use neuroscientific information-including
diagnostic measures such as imaging technologies-to address
rationally the responsibility of those who commit "bad" or criminal
acts.
|